Agentic code review · Tool review
CodeRabbit pricing, three per-seat tiers from $24 a developer a month
Updated 2026-10-10 · markdown mirror
Verdict
CodeRabbit prices per seat, $24, $48, and $72 a developer a month across Essentials, Team, and Advanced when billed annually, or $30, $60, and $90 month-to-month, so annual billing saves roughly 20 percent. Reviews are unlimited in total on every tier, subject to per-developer hourly burst allowances, and public repositories are reviewed free forever. If review volume is spiky and low, the per-run and credit-priced tools in this cluster can undercut a seat that bills the same in a quiet month.
| Tier | Price | Verified | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essentials | $24/user/mo Documented at the source Checked 2026-10-10 www.coderabbit.ai /pricing Annual-billed figure; monthly billing is $30 a developer. Every plan carries a 14-day free trial, no credit card | 2026-10-10 | www.coderabbit.ai |
| Team | $48/user/mo Documented at the source Checked 2026-10-10 www.coderabbit.ai /pricing Billed annually, adds multi-repo analysis, custom pre-merge checks, and unit-test generation | 2026-10-10 | www.coderabbit.ai |
| Advanced | $72/user/mo Documented at the source Checked 2026-10-10 www.coderabbit.ai /pricing Billed annually, adds continuous repository security monitoring and a security review of each PR | 2026-10-10 | www.coderabbit.ai |
● tested by us · ● documented at the source · ● unconfirmed, queued in /confirm.txt — hover or tap a dot for the source and date
What it is
CodeRabbit is the category’s default standalone reviewer, an AI-first pull request reviewer with context-aware feedback and one-click fixes. This page covers its pricing only, the six-tool comparison with our own benchmark data lives on the agentic code review hub.
The price ladder, verified 10 October 2026 [1]
| Plan | Annual | Monthly | What it adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essentials | $24 developer/month | $30 developer/month | Agentic reviews on every PR, one-click fixes, learnings, loops with coding agents |
| Team | $48 developer/month | $60 developer/month | Multi-repo analysis, custom pre-merge checks, unit-test generation, post-merge actions |
| Advanced | $72 developer/month | $90 developer/month | Blast-radius impact analysis, security review of every PR, continuous security monitoring |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | SSO, audit logging, self-hosting, EU SaaS deployment, SLA support |
Annual billing saves about 20 percent against the monthly figures, and both ladders sit on the one page. Every paid tier includes a 14-day free trial with no credit card. Reviews are unlimited in total on every tier, subject to a per-developer hourly allowance for bursts of activity. Alongside the ladder, a CodeRabbit Agent product runs coding tasks in the cloud and bills per minute of agent runtime, with no published rate.
The free routes
Two, and they are different in kind. Public open-source repositories get unlimited reviews free forever, past the trial, no expiry [1]. Private repositories get the 14-day trial, then the ladder. There is no permanent free plan for private work in this cluster’s default pick.
Don’t use it if
Volume is spiky and low, because seats bill identically in a quiet month and a busy one. The per-run and credit-priced tools in this cluster exist for exactly that shape. And if month-to-month billing is a requirement, budget for the monthly figures, $30, $60, and $90, about 20 percent more than the annual ladder [1].
FAQ
How much does CodeRabbit cost?
Three published tiers, all priced per developer, Essentials $24, Team $48, and Advanced $72 a developer a month billed annually, or $30, $60, and $90 month-to-month, with Enterprise custom. Annual billing saves about 20 percent. Every plan carries a 14-day free trial with no credit card. A five-developer team pays $120 a month on Essentials, $240 on Team, or $360 on Advanced on annual billing. Verified on the vendor pricing page, 10 October 2026 [1].
Does CodeRabbit have a free plan?
Not for private repositories, the free route is open source. CodeRabbit reviews public repositories free forever, and the vendor states those free reviews continue with no expiry. Private repositories get a 14-day free trial on every plan, then the ladder starts at $24 a developer a month on annual billing. Verified 10 October 2026 [1].
What is the difference between CodeRabbit Essentials, Team, and Advanced?
Money buys depth and control, not the reviewer itself, agentic reviews, one-click fixes, and learnings ship on every tier. Essentials at $24 is the base reviewer. Team at $48 adds multi-repo analysis, custom pre-merge checks, and unit-test generation. Advanced at $72 adds blast-radius impact analysis, a security review of every PR, and continuous security monitoring. All prices per developer a month [1].
How much does CodeRabbit cost for a five-developer team?
$120 a month on Essentials, $240 on Team, or $360 on Advanced, all on annual billing. The same five developers pay $150 for Greptile Pro or $200 for Graphite Team in this cluster, so the per-seat field is tight and the tie-breaker is review depth, not price. Steady PR flow and no security requirements, Essentials. Security review on every PR, Advanced at $360.
Is CodeRabbit priced per seat or per review?
Per seat, with no cap on total reviews on any tier, so a quiet month costs the same as a noisy one, though each plan adds a per-developer hourly allowance for bursts. Usage-shaped alternatives price differently, Ellipsis charges about $0.74 a review with $10 of free monthly credit, and Greptile meters reviews in credits. High, steady review volume favours CodeRabbit's flat seat, occasional reviews favour the per-run tools.
Sources
- CodeRabbit pricing — Vendor pricing page listing Essentials at $24, Team at $48, and Advanced at $72 per developer a month billed annually, $30, $60, and $90 on monthly plans, a 14-day free trial with no credit card, free reviews forever for public repositories, and a CodeRabbit Agent product billed per minute of agent runtime, verified 2026-10-10
Numbered markers in the text refer to this list. External sources are cited, not affiliated.